Atria35 wrote:There's no guarantee that the stuff that's shown on that hour-earlier slot will be American Dad or Robot chicken, so that might also be a factor. I mean, if they fill it with FMA and Kekkaishi, then there's less fuss.
Nate (post: 1449076) wrote:Wait, I'm confused. Why would showing American Dad first on Adult Swim make a fuss?
American Dad gets shown at 9 on Fox...a channel which is bound by FCC regulations. In other words, American Dad is shown earlier on a channel that everyone can get, even those who don't have cable, and is subject to stricter regulations than it would be on Adult Swim. American Dad also gets shown at like 1 in the afternoon on TBS. How could anyone possibly complain about American Dad or Family Guy moving earlier up in the lineup?
Nate (post: 1449053) wrote:Adult Swim may be targeted to adults, but so are shows like Friends and Seinfeld, and those are shown at like 5 in the afternoon. Where's the outrage over those shows being shown when kids can watch them? Burn Notice comes on at like 8 PM. That isn't a kids' show. Why is Adult Swim being held to a double standard?
The shows on Adult Swim are no worse than South Park, and South Park gets shown at all times of the day. Comedy Central has even played the movie unedited at 8 or 9 PM, which has far worse content than Adult Swim ever has or ever will.
In short, there is nothing wrong with this at all. Anyone who has a problem is overreacting. Besides for someone who likes to complain about how Cartoon Network sucks so bad and they're horrible, I'd think you wouldn't really care if Adult Swim took up more of their time.
mysngoeshere56 (post: 1449092) wrote:It's not like they're switching over to playing it 24/7.
Beau Soir wrote:I think it's promoting crude humor.
kids' cartoon station.
Nate (post: 1449147) wrote:Last I checked it's called "Cartoon Network" not "Children's Network." I thought as anime fans we were supposed to know that cartoons are not only for kids. So why turn around and say "Since it shows cartoons it's clearly a children's station"? It's completely inconsistent.
battletech wrote:I agree with everything Nate has said in this thread]
Birds falling out of the sky, fish dying...now this.
Maybe it IS the end of the world.I don't think I'm going out on a limb to say that most Americans generally view animation as "cartoons for children" first.
Oh I agree completely. My point was to say that Cartoon Network is a "children's network" is completely false. And while I could understand it if it was coming from your regular American citizen, to have an anime fan say "It's a children's network because it shows cartoons" just completely baffles me. Unless the only anime they ever saw was the 4Kids dub of Pokemon.While we can sit here and say, "Parents need to keep track of what their kids are watching," I would guess that most thinking this are NOT parents. It's not that easy, even with parental controls on television.
rocklobster (post: 1449040) wrote:I mean stuff like Venture Bros and King of the Hill, stuff no one would let a little kid be warped by. Is this a bad idea?
Shao Feng-Li (post: 1449229) wrote:I'm gonna kinda echo everyone here. Kids are already watching worse things on other channels.
ChristianKitsune (post: 1449058) wrote:It's pretty much up to the parents here, they have to well, be parents and if they don't want their kids watching this stuff, then they need to step in and turn the TV off.
This means more kids will accidentally see inappropriate stuff. And no, I don't mean borderline programs like Kekkaishi, I mean stuff like Venture Bros and King of the Hill, stuff no one would let a little kid be warped by. Is this a bad idea?
" wrote:RustyClaymore 11:27 - Ah yes, Socks is the single raindrop responsible for the flood. XD
Return to General Entertainment
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 449 guests