Help with antiderivatives

Homework giving you a headache? Math gives you a migraine? Can't quite figure out how to do something in photoshop? Never fear, the other members of CAA share their expertise in this forum.

Help with antiderivatives

Postby Nate » Tue Jan 10, 2006 6:08 pm

My instructor unfortunately assigned us homework with almost no in-class explanation of how to do this.

I'm stuck on number 2. This is probably really easy, which is why I feel so stupid now. Here's the problem:

"Verify directly that F is an antiderivative of f."

The problem is:

F(x) = x e^x + (pi); f(x) = e^x (1+x)

I really, really just don't have any clue where to even begin with this one...I know the antiderivative of e^x is still e^x, but other than that, I'm lost.
Image

Ezekiel 23:20
User avatar
Nate
 
Posts: 10725
Joined: Thu Sep 02, 2004 12:00 pm
Location: Oh right, like anyone actually cares.

Postby Technomancer » Tue Jan 10, 2006 6:33 pm

You have two options. The first (and easiest), is to realize that if F is the a.d of f, then f must be the derivative of F. In that case, you simply need to differentiate F and verify that it is equal to f (which it is). The second approach is to work out the integral of f, in which case, I believe you will have to use integration by parts. I'm guessing though that the former approach is the one you will find in the solutions manual.
The scientific method," Thomas Henry Huxley once wrote, "is nothing but the normal working of the human mind." That is to say, when the mind is working; that is to say further, when it is engaged in corrrecting its mistakes. Taking this point of view, we may conclude that science is not physics, biology, or chemistry—is not even a "subject"—but a moral imperative drawn from a larger narrative whose purpose is to give perspective, balance, and humility to learning.

Neil Postman
(The End of Education)

Anti-intellectualism has been a constant thread winding its way through our political and cultural life, nurtured by the false notion that democracy means that my ignorance is just as good as your knowledge

Isaac Aasimov
User avatar
Technomancer
 
Posts: 2379
Joined: Fri Jun 13, 2003 11:47 am
Location: Tralfamadore

Postby Nate » Tue Jan 10, 2006 6:42 pm

Thanks...you're right. I just took the derivative of F(x), which was easy enough, and showed it that way...no wonder I didn't understand how to do it the other way. Integration by parts isn't for another 10 chapters. ><
Image

Ezekiel 23:20
User avatar
Nate
 
Posts: 10725
Joined: Thu Sep 02, 2004 12:00 pm
Location: Oh right, like anyone actually cares.


Return to Tutorials

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 50 guests