Michael wrote:I think this movie will be pretty unfaithful to the books. Or--in other words--bad.
I think if they WERE faithful to the books, the last 3 movies would be PG-13. But they won't. J.K. ROWLING, IF YOU ARE READING THIS, KEEP US FROM SUCH HERESY!!!!
Mangafanatic wrote:GREAT NEWS, GUYS!! The mpaa has dubbed Goblet of Fire PG-13! Praise the Lord! That means we'll get real wizard duels and not dumbed down kiddy fare. Rock on, Goblet of Fire. Rock. On.
uc pseudonym wrote:What I really want is fast duels.
Mangafanatic wrote:Indeed, the minimal dueling we saw in Chamber was so strung out that it looked more like a Dragonball Z fight scene. Way too much "power up" going on. . .
Myoti wrote:Whether they follow the book had never really mattered much to me. If it's good as a movie, I'm fine.
Mangafanatic wrote:Same here. I try to view the movies as a loose telling of the book. For Harry Potter movies, that's necessary to enjoying them because there's really no way that they can possibly fit everything you enjoyed in the book into an hour and a half or two hours. Not that they have to. . . *coughLordoftheRingscough*
uc pseudonym wrote:Even the third movie had to cut quite a bit (not entire plot elements, but everything felt crunched due to limited space). Because they are a different medium, the movies have to be considerably different than the books. I take them for what they are.
Bobtheduck wrote:I'm a bit annoyed that they're taking the house elves out entirely... I know many people are cheering, but they were sort of, um, very important to this chapter of the story... Along those lines, are they going to pull a "peeves" and adjust the stories from here on to take out winky and kreacher and dobby alltogether? I think Kreacher in particular is very important in OotP, and it would change the story drastically to remove him entirely...
Still, I'll be seeing it as soon as it comes out...
Mangafanatic wrote:*Dons S.A.H.I.T.M pin (society for the apprance of House Elves in this movie)*
Yumie wrote:Um, I think my dear Onee-chan meant *appearance, not *apprance, but I could be wrong on that. . .
Well, after correcting the typo, I too will wear a pin and hope that we're not disappointed.
Return to General Entertainment
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 233 guests