DarkNozomi wrote:Curses are mentioned in the Bible, you know.
Baal is mentioned in the Bible so I guess he's real too.
Look the thing about curses in those days was that family and the nation were big deals. This is why a man was obligated to marry his brother's widow if his brother died without producing a son, and why he was publicly humiliated if he refused to carry out this duty. You did not want to have your children or their children shamed or harmed, because it was a big deal. Saying "If you mess up your kids are going to bear the burden" was a pretty effective deterrent.
In today's society, the family name and carrying on your line is not as important. People don't really worry about shaming their family name since it's not a big deal in our society. Curses weren't supposed to make the descendants feel shame for what their ancestor did, it was a way of discouraging certain sins. These days if you were to tell someone that their descendants would suffer because of what they did, their response would likely be "So what, I don't care, they're not me." It's not an effective deterrent.
Not to mention that blaming curses was why we got crap like the Salem Witch Trials and abuse of infants and children. It's pretty childish and silly to believe in curses these days, and is really just a last ditch effort to try and make sense of a cold, uncaring world. It's mostly just a defense mechanism to escape from the reality that the world is fallen and imperfect, and crappy things happen that aren't the fault of anybody.
As a final thought, I'll quote John 9, where I believe Jesus speaks pretty clearly against curses.
As he went along, he saw a man blind from birth. 2 His disciples asked him, “Rabbi, who sinned, this man or his parents, that he was born blind?â€