Tarnish (post: 1282953) wrote:I'd care a lot more if Cartoon Network had shown anything halfway decent in the last five years.
Which is to say I could not possibly care less.
goldenspines wrote:Its only stealing if you don't get caught.
Lochaber Axe (post: 1282988) wrote:This is just like Sci-fi channel getting rid of MST3K for... bad B-movies.
ashfire wrote:it takes time to do the art of a anime series where American cartoon can be done on a cheaper less artly scale
MasterDias (post: 1282993) wrote:...and the History Channel deciding that shows about logging crews...and alien abductions, somehow fit into their subject matter.
ashfire wrote:there are some American
cartoons that I just don't won't sit and watch.
Nate (post: 1283050) wrote:Well yeah, I'm the same way (I refuse to watch crap like Flapjack). My point was that contrary to what most people think, American cartoons are animated way better than anime. Yeah, there were things like Transformers and GI Joe in the 80s (the animation in those was terrible at many points), but watch Batman: The Animated Series compared to oh, say, Naruto, and it's a world of difference. You'll never see Batman standing around without his head, for example. You'll also never see a "Good Batman you look kind of cool!" moment.
Anime is animated cheaply, with the exception of movies or OAVs. Anime is almost always poorly done, whereas American cartoons are usually done well.
If you're simply talking about STYLE, that's one thing. Style is a matter of personal taste. But if you're just talking about animation quality, American cartoons beat anime down hard.
MasterDias wrote:The animation quality of much shorter anime by studios like Sunrise, Bones, Gonzo, and Production IG is going to be far, far better than any series like Naruto.
LadyRushia (post: 1282881) wrote:
This is dumb. Not everyone who watches cartoons is a teenage boy.
uc pseudonym (post: 1283317) wrote:I have only one reaction to all of this:
Nate (post: 1283196) wrote:Also I think listing Shin-chan was a bad idea, as the reason it looks like that is stylistic choice, much like Home Movies. But again, the reason I compared that to Batman: TAS was to disprove the blanket statement that all anime is breathtaking art and American cartoons are cheap crap. There's a lot of anime that's cheap crap (Naruto, Bleach, One Piece, most shounen series that run for ages), and there's a lot of American cartoons that have amazing art (Gargoyles, Batman: TAS, Swat Kats, so on).
Also what's wrong with Ripping Friends? That show was fantastic.
Funny you say that because I don't know any teenage guys that watch cartoons unless they have the words "Family" or "Guy" or perhaps "South" or "Park."
I mean most people I know that watch Naruto or other shonen anime are 12 at the oldest.
Radical Dreamer (post: 1282874) wrote:Ridiculous. I mean ... it's the Cartoon Network.
Return to General Entertainment
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 372 guests