Fish and Chips wrote:Will Mr. SmartyPants actually ask a question?
All answers point to "No."
WRONG!
Okay. Do you like clipping your nails?
Fish and Chips wrote:Will Mr. SmartyPants actually ask a question?
All answers point to "No."
goldenspines wrote:Its only stealing if you don't get caught.
Fish and Chips wrote:Do you like clipping your nails?
Not particularly, but some one's got to do it.
Mr. SmartyPants wrote:Originally posted by Fish and Chips:
Will Mr. SmartyPants actually ask a question?
All answers point to "No."
WRONG!
Okay. Do you like clipping your nails?
Fish and Chips wrote:Of course, but first, do you mean denomination-wise, or by some other scale? Sorry, I'll answer as best as I can after you can clear that up for me.
Fish and Chips wrote:And my zodiac sign is Aquarius (though I personally don't believe in the zodiac, it's just a nice touch).
Fish and Chips wrote:It should be Colin and Ryan's. Those guys need to release a comedy duo album or something.
uc pseudonym wrote:Denomination is fine, so long as you feel it more or less represents what you believe. Some people really like to list schools of thought (preterist, Gnostic,dualist, Augustinian, etc) and I wanted to leave that option open as well. You could also answer the following sub-question: which set of religious issues do you think are more important, those stereotypically liberal or stereotypically conservative?
Fish and Chips wrote:anyone seriously bent on thinking about it or discussing it should bare these two divisions in mind and be able to tell the difference (you have no idea how many times I've seen Atheists use descriptive passages as if they were prescriptive in arguments. It's laughable
uc pseudonym wrote:Thank you for your response]
The pleasure was mine.uc pseudonym wrote:This is a distinction I wish was emphasized more today, so it is good to see you have a clear grasp of it. I also find it odd that so many atheists act as though they believe taking random quotes from a complicated book of many genres is a good way to judge its value.
I've been active on the Internet roughly three years now, and let me assure you: in a debate, anything can happen. The right snippit of the wrong verse thrown into an argument can cause Christians to panic, not to mention such ripping is the source of most "Contradiction" sites and lists I've seen. Of course, the nice side to this is if you can counter, you've successfully foiled their plans.uc pseudonym wrote:Anyway, I'm out of questions for the moment, but I shall lurk in order to learn more.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 421 guests