Postby Technomancer » Thu Feb 26, 2004 2:34 pm
My own thoughts on the film are that is indeed a masterpiece. In its production, its themes and its cinematography it is absolutely first rate. However, I will admit that one criticism of the film is not without some truth. Namely, that the film does not make sense as a film, in that it lacks the familiar sort of story and character development that make up a good tale. Of course, this is only a problem if you expect to be "going to the movies" and not to a passion play.
Each and every one of us here sees the film through the lens of belief and culture. We know the story; we know the whys and wherefores of it, and that's why it is a work of such tremendous power. I am forced to admit though, that those lacking such familiarity will probably be at something of a loss with regards to this film.
PS.
I liked the fact that they put in the scene with Veronica's veil. I remember hearing that story in elemtary school year after year.
The scientific method," Thomas Henry Huxley once wrote, "is nothing but the normal working of the human mind." That is to say, when the mind is working; that is to say further, when it is engaged in corrrecting its mistakes. Taking this point of view, we may conclude that science is not physics, biology, or chemistry—is not even a "subject"—but a moral imperative drawn from a larger narrative whose purpose is to give perspective, balance, and humility to learning.
Neil Postman
(The End of Education)
Anti-intellectualism has been a constant thread winding its way through our political and cultural life, nurtured by the false notion that democracy means that my ignorance is just as good as your knowledge
Isaac Aasimov