Question on substances (philosophy)

Homework giving you a headache? Math gives you a migraine? Can't quite figure out how to do something in photoshop? Never fear, the other members of CAA share their expertise in this forum.

Question on substances (philosophy)

Postby Sammy Boy » Mon Jan 30, 2006 3:05 am

Hi all,

I was wondering if anyone has studied philosophy here and in particular, properties and substances?

The book I'm reading says that Fido (a brown dog) is a deeper unity of properties than a heap of salt.

It does not explicitly say why, but it does state that Fido has more properties (colour, parts, etc.) than the heap of salt. However, I am not sure if this is the reason for it being a deeper unity, hence I wanted to check this with someone.

Thanks in anticipation.
User avatar
Sammy Boy
 
Posts: 1410
Joined: Wed May 25, 2005 7:04 am
Location: Autobase, Cybertron

Postby CDLviking » Mon Jan 30, 2006 9:28 am

Coming from a Thomistic/Aristotelian view, I think it would be because of the animal's higher order of being. Inorganic material such as salt is at the very bottom of the order of being and has virtually no ability to maintain its being, and thus its accidental properties. Animals are about half way up the order of being and have more of an ability to maintain their being and all of their accidental properties that are contained within that being. That's the first thing that comes to mind without knowing the context or philosopher.
User avatar
CDLviking
 
Posts: 1794
Joined: Sat Feb 21, 2004 10:28 pm
Location: Phoenix

Postby Sammy Boy » Mon Jan 30, 2006 11:13 pm

Thanks for that.

Okay, I guess I should have provided you with more information.

The authors are J. P. Moreland and William Lane Craig, and the book is "Philosophical Foundations for a Christian Worldview".
User avatar
Sammy Boy
 
Posts: 1410
Joined: Wed May 25, 2005 7:04 am
Location: Autobase, Cybertron


Return to Tutorials

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 102 guests