Google Creates Self-Driving Cars...

Talk about anything in here.

Google Creates Self-Driving Cars...

Postby Cognitive Gear » Sat Oct 09, 2010 7:45 pm

...and has been testing them on live roads. They've apparently logged over 140,000 miles, some of which was driven on my favorite highways.

source

Truly the future is a magnificent thing. I can only hope that this technology performs as they say it does, as it could potentially lead to less accident related deaths.
[font="Tahoma"][SIZE="2"]"It was so much easier to blame it on Them. It was bleakly depressing to think that They were Us. If it was Them, then nothing was anyone's fault. If it was us, what did that make Me? After all, I'm one of Us. I must be. I've certainly never thought of myself as one of Them. No one ever thinks of themselves as one of Them. We're always one of Us. It's Them that do the bad things."

-Terry Pratchett[/SIZE][/font]
User avatar
Cognitive Gear
 
Posts: 2381
Joined: Sun Jan 09, 2005 9:00 am

Postby Hitomi » Sat Oct 09, 2010 8:18 pm

i heard about this a few years ago but it was just in the testing part
User avatar
Hitomi
 
Posts: 101
Joined: Sat Mar 20, 2010 11:26 am
Location: somewhere in the west.

Postby Ante Bellum » Sat Oct 09, 2010 9:28 pm

The only thing I can think of is, "Is there anyone in the car, and if not how many people have outright PANICKED so far?"
Image
User avatar
Ante Bellum
 
Posts: 1347
Joined: Tue Apr 07, 2009 2:59 pm
Location: E U R O B E A T H E L L

Postby Peanut » Sat Oct 09, 2010 11:27 pm

...further proof that Google is the real Skynet...
CAA's Resident Starcraft Expert
Image

goldenspines wrote:Its only stealing if you don't get caught.
User avatar
Peanut
 
Posts: 2432
Joined: Sun Aug 29, 2004 5:39 pm
Location: Definitely not behind you

Postby Nekomimi » Sun Oct 10, 2010 12:28 am

I wonder how fast auto makers will jump on this technology?
Nekomimi
 
Posts: 57
Joined: Sun Jun 20, 2010 12:01 am

Postby Yuki-Anne » Sun Oct 10, 2010 1:40 am

Is anyone else thinking "I, Robot" right now?
Image
New and improved Yuki-Anne: now with blog: http://anneinjapan.blog.com
User avatar
Yuki-Anne
 
Posts: 1637
Joined: Thu Aug 10, 2006 10:33 am
Location: Japan

Postby Mr. Hat'n'Clogs » Sun Oct 10, 2010 11:59 am

Google will soon take over the world.

Though honestly, I've been wondering how long technology like this will take to develop. Think about all the accidents that will be avoided once every car is like this.
User avatar
Mr. Hat'n'Clogs
 
Posts: 2364
Joined: Sun Apr 19, 2009 2:16 pm
Location: The Roaring Song-City

Postby armeck » Sun Oct 10, 2010 2:40 pm

google is amazing!
Just some punk kid that likes techno music
User avatar
armeck
 
Posts: 1020
Joined: Wed Feb 04, 2009 11:52 am
Location: idek

Postby Warrior4Christ » Mon Oct 11, 2010 2:10 am

I heard it on our news - my favourite part is "Google have yet to decide how they will profit from this research". XD
I'd love to have one of the cars to test.
Although, I do love driving.... Fascinating technology nonetheless.

Ante Bellum (post: 1430325) wrote:The only thing I can think of is, "Is there anyone in the car, and if not how many people have outright PANICKED so far?"

From what I can tell, their testing has always had someone inside. Yep, found it - "Our cars are never unmanned."
Everywhere like such as, and MOES.

"Expect great things from God; attempt great things for God." - William Carey
User avatar
Warrior4Christ
 
Posts: 2045
Joined: Sat Aug 20, 2005 8:10 pm
Location: Carefully place an additional prawn on the barbecue

Postby MomentOfInertia » Mon Oct 11, 2010 7:39 pm

Hmmm. limited application, expensive, no one will fully trust it for years to come.
MAL - CAA MAL club - Avatar from Hyouka
"DaughterOfZion 06:19 - forget love, fudge conquers all. xD"
"Written assignments are never finished, only due." -me
-Speak not unless you can improve the silence.-
MOES: Members Observing Efficient Sigs
User avatar
MomentOfInertia
 
Posts: 1316
Joined: Tue May 25, 2010 7:21 pm
Location: Around

Postby Mr. Hat'n'Clogs » Mon Oct 11, 2010 7:49 pm

MomentOfInertia (post: 1430602) wrote:Hmmm. limited application, expensive, no one will fully trust it for years to come.
Now, I wouldn't say I have firsthand experience, but wouldn't people have said the same thing about cars when they first started coming out?
User avatar
Mr. Hat'n'Clogs
 
Posts: 2364
Joined: Sun Apr 19, 2009 2:16 pm
Location: The Roaring Song-City

Postby Icarus » Mon Oct 11, 2010 8:22 pm

Peanut (post: 1430345) wrote:...further proof that Google is the real Skynet...


Even more.

Personally, IF I ever got one, I'd still like the option to completely disable the software.
The Forsworn War of 34

††
User avatar
Icarus
 
Posts: 1477
Joined: Sun Nov 09, 2003 5:00 am
Location: 34

Postby shooraijin » Mon Oct 11, 2010 9:35 pm

Mr. Hat'n'Clogs (post: 1430604) wrote:Now, I wouldn't say I have firsthand experience, but wouldn't people have said the same thing about cars when they first started coming out?


Probably. On the other hand, something like this is likely to be tied up for years in regulatory red tape, which wouldn't have existed (to that extent) in Henry Ford's day.
"you're a doctor.... and 27 years.... so...doctor + 27 years = HATORI SOHMA" - RoyalWing, when I was 27
"Al hail the forum editting Shooby! His vibes are law!" - Osaka-chan

I could still be champ, but I'd feel bad taking it away from one of the younger guys. - George Foreman
User avatar
shooraijin
 
Posts: 9927
Joined: Thu Jun 26, 2003 12:00 pm
Location: Southern California

Postby Warrior4Christ » Tue Oct 12, 2010 3:27 am

Icarus (post: 1430619) wrote:Personally, IF I ever got one, I'd still like the option to completely disable the software.

As in disable the automatic stuff? I doubt the software would go any more disabled than that. But then if you did that, you'd just have wasted a whole lot of money on a feature you don't use.

Mr. Hat'n'Clogs (post: 1430604) wrote:Now, I wouldn't say I have firsthand experience, but wouldn't people have said the same thing about cars when they first started coming out?

Well.. the leap from no car for the masses to an affordable car for the masses is a great advantage to the masses. A massive leap.

A leap from a person-driven car to an auto-driven car is... not a massive advantage to the masses. Great for lazy people, sending off your children to school by themselves, and um.. anything else? It seems the huge extra cost would not be worth it to most people, at least initially....
Everywhere like such as, and MOES.

"Expect great things from God; attempt great things for God." - William Carey
User avatar
Warrior4Christ
 
Posts: 2045
Joined: Sat Aug 20, 2005 8:10 pm
Location: Carefully place an additional prawn on the barbecue

Postby Mr. Hat'n'Clogs » Tue Oct 12, 2010 2:29 pm

Warrior4Christ (post: 1430651) wrote:Well.. the leap from no car for the masses to an affordable car for the masses is a great advantage to the masses. A massive leap.

A leap from a person-driven car to an auto-driven car is... not a massive advantage to the masses. Great for lazy people, sending off your children to school by themselves, and um.. anything else? It seems the huge extra cost would not be worth it to most people, at least initially....
Well, I suppose I'm not well-read on Australia, but America has quite a few drunk drivers, something the many programs we see in school about how bad it is never seem to stop, but that, for instance, wouldn't be a problem with self-driving cars. Also, people who are bad drivers but aren't necessarily drunk also don't have to have driving problems. There's more but my head isn't feeling great so I don't want to write a long post.
User avatar
Mr. Hat'n'Clogs
 
Posts: 2364
Joined: Sun Apr 19, 2009 2:16 pm
Location: The Roaring Song-City

Postby ShiroiHikari » Tue Oct 12, 2010 2:52 pm

I don't see it solving the drunk driving problem as someone who's drunk enough to get into a car wreck probably also wouldn't have the presence of mind to engage the autopilot.
fightin' in the eighties
User avatar
ShiroiHikari
 
Posts: 7564
Joined: Wed May 28, 2003 12:00 pm
Location: Somewhere between 1983 and 1989

Postby Mr. Hat'n'Clogs » Tue Oct 12, 2010 3:23 pm

Maybe I'm being optimistic, as I've never been drunk, but if it was default on autopilot I wouldn't think they'd shut it off because they're drunk?

Okay, I'm being optimistic, but I still think this is a pretty useful shift.
User avatar
Mr. Hat'n'Clogs
 
Posts: 2364
Joined: Sun Apr 19, 2009 2:16 pm
Location: The Roaring Song-City


Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 156 guests